Krags actually have strong actions; it's the bolt that was reported to have failed (110 years ago) when they were really still just figuring out the parameters of smokeless powder. The bolts reportedly cracked at the forward main locking lug. They were probably replaced; I've never seen a cracked Krag bolt and if you don't see a crack as described, you're in good shape. There were no reports of Krag actions failing like subsequent 1903 Springfields - just cracked bolts. Inspect your bolt periodically if you're shooting loads that you're not sure if the pressure level is OK. Are you casting your own bullets? Do you want to continue shooting cast bullets? As the previous responder implied, Remington manufactures 30-40 factory ammo that gives about 2450 fps. If I were hunting with my Krag, that's what I'd want to use. I've never heard of anyone having pressure problems with the currently available factory ammo and it's an effective loading. My own opinion is that a lot has been made of this legend of "weak Krag actions" and I think a lot of the facts have been forgotten (or never known) as it came down through the years. I have a Model 1898 that was made in 1902. I would trust it with somewhat higher pressure loads than I'd be comfortable with in an 1892 or 1896. The steel forging and heat treatment processes that were used for 1903 Springfields were also available and being used in 1902 and 1903 to make Krags. The steel is not inferior but the bolt locking mechanism had limitations. I've exceeded max. pressure limits with handloads by a grain or so with no signs of over pressure. You just have to use good judgement based on the condition and age of your particular gun and the available information.