I'll post this in the Sporter category but my question somewhat straddles the line. Either way, it seems like folks here happily spend time in all areas.

The back story: A few years back, I fell in lust with a friend's sporter Krag. Absolutely marvelous rendition of the breed and I was taken. Some bit of time later, I picked up a lovely piece of walnut with which to build my very own. The only thing needed was a donor rifle and I knew one would be along shortly.

Well sure enough, I happen into a Krag rifle which has had the military stock cut and handguard removed, all for a reasonable price. The bore is decent and may scrub out better but I haven't put much effort into it yet.

Coincident to this time, I also fell in lust (it's a common thread in my life) with various long-barreled English sporting rifles. I thought that maybe I could start with the full rifle-length Krag done up all "Englishy" and, if it proved too ungainly, cut it back a bit. I already have a 24" sporter Krag so I was thinking something a bit more leggy.

My quandary comes with the fact that I have a relatively unmolested Krag rifle. It has virtually no finish left but it also does not have any holes which are not factory issued or other permanent modifications.

This leads me to wondering if perhaps it should be brought back to martial goodness, albeit "restored". I'd need all the wood (or perhaps a forearm splice plus handguard) and perhaps a few bits of stock metal but not much. Yep, I know it has little or no collector value as is or restored and, if I did so, I would be putting some sort of laminated card in the butt stock indicating date of restoration and what all had been done. Would this sort or rifle be allowed in these military arms matches? I'm not now a participant but it sounds interesting.

Down side to the above is that I'll have to find another Krag to scratch that sporter itch. Darn!

I know it's my rifle to do with as I please but I would appreciate hearing any thoughts.