I have had this Krag rifle for a while and wanted to take some pictures of it and share it with the KCA group to get some feedback. Always enjoy sharing Krag adventures and getting feedback analysis to learn more.

This was purchased from an auction about two years ago. I love M1896 rifles especially with a nice cartouche. There are not many M1896 Krags with great stocks and cartouches out there. I also like great bores but that feature was not described on the auction listing. Bore descriptions are generally not reliable when described by someone else unless they examine the bore with a borescope. That was one of my best investments years ago. Being able to directly see what the bore is for condition and cleaning purposes is real important with collecting any firearms.

So, this Krag, as you can see, has the 1896 cartouche, an 1894 dated receiver, and a stock that has the (thin) filled ram rod channel. The bolt body is a M1892 body but the rest of the bolt demonstrates M1896 changes with the hold open pin that matches the hold open notch on the receiver.

The M1892 rifle has obviously been updated to a Model 1896. There is a complete cut out in the butt stock for the oiler and cleaning rods.

Look at that 1896 cartouche. Have you ever seen a better one? And the stock looks unused other than a few blemishes. The grasping grooves and scallop bolt handle cut are sharp enough to cut cheese!

The bore, surprisingly, looks essentially unshot. There is no pitting or discernible wear even on close-up exam with the bore scope.

The question, though, is why does the receiver show wear to almost original "white" condition? The bolt, receiver and side plate all look like the patina matches. The magazine appears to have been re-blued. The butt plate is worn also. The barrel bands, rear sight, barrel and trigger guard show a little wear but not bad.

So, what do you think? This does look to be a put together Krag rifle but it is an interesting item.

Thanks for any feedback!

---