Krag Collectors Association Forum Archive
General >> Ammunition, reloading, shooting, etc >> Load for ruger
http://www.kragcollectorsassociation.org/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1587074185

Message started by Jim3040 on Apr 16th, 2020 at 9:56pm

Title: Load for ruger
Post by Jim3040 on Apr 16th, 2020 at 9:56pm
I have been away for awhile, have been shooting my 1896 carbine in local military matches. Good accuracy with 9.7 grains Unique and 165 grain cowboy cast bullet, very happy with it. Question is: would like to develop load for 30 40 Krag Ruger No. 3, but above load doesn’t work! Where do I start? Would of loved to have same load for both, guess won’t happen. 1896 does inch and under groups at 50 yards.

Title: Re: Load for ruger
Post by FredC on Apr 16th, 2020 at 10:12pm
What kind of hunting or shooting in the Ruger? Cast bullets or jacketed. Performance? The Ruger could be safely loaded to pressures that would be dangerous in the Krag.
Can you keep your ammos separate? Maybe you ought to sell that Ruger to me for $85.00 to help me get over that one I passed up years ago. :-) Others will get that joke. I will be able to keep the ammo straight as my other Krag that I use is 35 caliber.

Title: Re: Load for ruger
Post by Parashooter on Apr 16th, 2020 at 10:25pm
Cast Bullet Basics For Military Surplus Rifles
By C.E. Harris  Rev. 9-6-93

. . . Do NOT use inert fillers (Dacron or kapok) to take up the excess
empty space in the case.  This was once common practice, but it
raises chamber pressure and under certain conditions contributes
to chamber ringing.  If a particular load will not work well
without a filler, the powder is not suitable for those conditions
of loading.

Four load classifications from Mattern (1932) cover all uses for
the cast bullet military rifle.  I worked up equivalent charges
to obtain the desired velocity ranges with modern powders, which
provide a sound basis for loading cast bullets in any post-1898
military rifle from 7 mm to 8 mm:

1.  125-gr., plainbased "small game/gallery"
         900-1000 f.p.s., 5 grains of Bullseye or equivalent.

2.  150-gr. plainbased "100-yd. target/small game",
         1050-1250 f.p.s., 7 grs. of Bullseye or equivalent.

3.  150-180-gr. gaschecked "200-yard target"
         1500-1600 f.p.s., 16 grs. of #2400 or equivalent.

. . . None of these loads are maximum when used in full-sized rifle
cases such as the .30-40 Krag, .303 British, 7.65 Argentine, 7.7
Jap, 7.62x54R or .30-'06.

. . . For "gaschecked bullets loaded without the gascheck," for cases
like the .303 British, 7.62 NATO, 7.62x54R Russian and .30-'06 I
use 6-7 grains of almost any fast burning pistol powder,
including, but not limited to Bullseye, W-W231, SR-7625, Green
Dot, Red Dot, or 700-X.  I have also had fine results with 8 to 9
grains of medium burning rate pistol or shotgun powders, such as
Unique, PB, Herco, or SR-4756 in any case of .303 British size or
larger.
. . . My favorite load is the most accurate, Mattern's so-called "200-
yard target load".  I expect 10-shot groups at 200 yards, firing
prone rapid with sling to average 4-5". . .

Title: Re: Load for ruger
Post by Jim3040 on Apr 17th, 2020 at 12:02am
I have not used filler and I think my Unique loads travel about 1400 fps.  I shoot paper mostly, my next step, I think, is try factory shells and go from there. Thanks for the info.

Title: Re: Load for ruger
Post by Jim3040 on Apr 17th, 2020 at 12:05am
I think I will try the 16 gr-2400, 180 bullet idea :)

Title: Re: Load for ruger
Post by FredC on Apr 17th, 2020 at 1:04am
With that kind of shooting with mild loads behind lead bullets you may find one load that shoots equally well in both guns. That would make things a lot simpler.

Title: Re: Load for ruger
Post by Culpeper on Apr 17th, 2020 at 5:47am
I've read the C. E. Harris article over the last couple years and want to know who is this Mattern he refers to in the original piece.

Title: Re: Load for ruger
Post by Parashooter on Apr 17th, 2020 at 4:43pm
Found a facsimile Mattern book listed on Amazon and elsewhere - but the date is earlier than what Harris cites.   (You need to Login

A discussion of the subject can be viewed at   (You need to Login

Krag Collectors Association Forum Archive » Powered by YaBB 2.6.0!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.