Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2  Send TopicPrint
 10 1898 Krag Carbine question (Read 3312 times)
remington
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 48
Location: Denver, CO
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
Gender: Male
1898 Krag Carbine question
Jul 23rd, 2012 at 8:22pm
Print Post  
There is a Carbine on a web sight that is an 1898. By the serial number it dates Sept-1898. However, it has a 1902 sight. Could that be correct?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JOHN42768
KCA Official Member
***
Offline


Krag Collector!

Posts: 94
Location: Upstate N.Y.
Joined: Apr 30th, 2009
Gender: Male
Re: 1898 Krag Carbine question
Reply #1 - Jul 23rd, 2012 at 9:32pm
Print Post  
Hi, The '98 carbine has many features that can help you. Ser. ranges apprx. 117M to 134M. The correct stock is only applicable to that carbine. '98 cartouche, sling bar/ loop, '96 carbine "C" sights, 22" barrel with rounded muzzle crown, mortised front sight base to name a few. Not to say someone could  have changed the sight, barrel band and hand guard. '98 carbine is by far the most faked. Post some photos and see what responses come up. Compare it to the site photo section and I have mine posted under carbine eye candy & 2. It is about seven pages of post in. I compare the '96 to '98 to '99. It might help you spot any differences. I'm sure others will respond. John
« Last Edit: Jul 23rd, 2012 at 11:13pm by JOHN42768 »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
butlersrangers
KCA Forum Member
*
Online


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 2091
Location: Michigan Bi-Peninsular&Proud
Joined: Oct 7th, 2009
Re: 1898 Krag Carbine question
Reply #2 - Jul 23rd, 2012 at 10:58pm
Print Post  
remington:  Many of the 1898 Carbines were "up-graded" to 1899 Carbine configuration when they required overhaul.  These 1898 Carbines will be found with the long for-end 1899 style carbine stock.  I imagine 1896, 1901, and 1902 Carbine rear sights were all utilized on re-builds (with appropriate hand-guards).  The re-built Carbines are legitimate issue arms.  Just not as desirable as the unaltered version.
« Last Edit: Jul 24th, 2012 at 1:02am by butlersrangers »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
remington
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 48
Location: Denver, CO
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
Gender: Male
Re: 1898 Krag Carbine question
Reply #3 - Jul 25th, 2012 at 5:51pm
Print Post  
Butlersrangers and John42768. John, I have kept your photos of those great carbines. Maybe both of you would take a look at the Carbine and give me an opinion. It is on Gunbroker item 297758058. thank you---Charlie
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
butlersrangers
KCA Forum Member
*
Online


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 2091
Location: Michigan Bi-Peninsular&Proud
Joined: Oct 7th, 2009
Re: 1898 Krag Carbine question
Reply #4 - Jul 25th, 2012 at 8:53pm
Print Post  
remington:  I've been watching that carbine myself.  The owner does not specify the condition of the bore.  I believe the serial # is 132592 (Sept. 1898).  The exterior metal and wood appear quite good.  I believe it is a correct up-graded 1898 Carbine.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
psteinmayer
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 854
Location: Ypsilanti, Michgan
Joined: Aug 30th, 2011
Gender: Male
Re: 1898 Krag Carbine question
Reply #5 - Jul 26th, 2012 at 1:44am
Print Post  
My 1898 Rifle is serial number 132598!
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Dick Hosmer
KCA Official Member
***
Offline


Collector of Springfield
Arms, 1865-1915

Posts: 1247
Location: Northern California
Joined: Nov 20th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: 1898 Krag Carbine question
Reply #6 - Jul 26th, 2012 at 6:53am
Print Post  
psteinmayer wrote on Jul 26th, 2012 at 1:44am:
My 1898 Rifle is serial number 132598! 



And that's the problem with the "1898 Carbine".

You almost never know if one is real, or not. The safest position is to assume it isn't.

All one needs to do is take a common 1899 and fit it with a believable receiver - voila - instant "rare" gun. In that condition, if marked 1899, the price would probably be at triple what it is now.

FWIW, there are no (as in zip, zilch, nada) carbines known between 131535 and 133725. Caveat emptor!
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
JOHN42768
KCA Official Member
***
Offline


Krag Collector!

Posts: 94
Location: Upstate N.Y.
Joined: Apr 30th, 2009
Gender: Male
Re: 1898 Krag Carbine question
Reply #7 - Jul 26th, 2012 at 3:01pm
Print Post  
Charlie, As stated by Butler's & Dick it is a crap shoot. A nice looking firearm. It has what appears to be a '98 carbine rear sight. I only can see the C on the base. I can't see anything on the front blade. The stock appears to be '99. I can't make out any cartoushe. The serial number is not listed in SRS books. It still falls loosely within the know bracket of numbers. A large percentage of the '98's were installed in '99 stocks with '98 or later rear sights. So I guess unless you could physically look for any marks that could indicate a barrel change over who knows. Never say never. John
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
remington
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 48
Location: Denver, CO
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
Gender: Male
Re: 1898 Krag Carbine question
Reply #8 - Jul 26th, 2012 at 3:54pm
Print Post  
Thank you again gentlemen. I also get a refinished feeling and that barrel band looks awfully "newish". Charlie
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
butlersrangers
KCA Forum Member
*
Online


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 2091
Location: Michigan Bi-Peninsular&Proud
Joined: Oct 7th, 2009
Re: 1898 Krag Carbine question
Reply #9 - Jul 26th, 2012 at 3:55pm
Print Post  
Charlie:  I would always defer to Dick Hosmer and MadFarmers on fine points of Krag production and models.  They have a sounder knowledge and longer experience with correct specimens and original documentation.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dick Hosmer
KCA Official Member
***
Offline


Collector of Springfield
Arms, 1865-1915

Posts: 1247
Location: Northern California
Joined: Nov 20th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: 1898 Krag Carbine question
Reply #10 - Jul 27th, 2012 at 4:53am
Print Post  
This will give you some idea of the odds:

5003   1898 Carbines were made, with short stocks, etc. Very soon after production they were called back and restocked.

Around 160+ are recorded.

13 are known @ 118xxx
52 are known @ 119xxx
49 are known @ 120xxx
Everything else is in single digits, but there are apparently significant blips at 125xxx and 131xxx.

Clearly, that (118-120xxx) is where the bulk of them probably occur (SA made arms in batches, based on the quarter of the year, and changing over the stocking machinery) upset only by pulling receivers from the bins using FILO).

The lowest verified specimen is 112864; the highest 134317, giving a difference of 21453 (plus some statistical allowance for not being positive of the high/low) say 22000 - dividing by 5003 = 4.4, which inescapably leads to the conclusion that around 70% of the offerings are, shall we say,"incorrect"!

Joe Farmer says he can positively ID genuine 1898 Carbines. When he makes such an unequivocal statement, I tend to believe it to be accurate, though in the case he has not shared the method with me.

So - it's a crap-shoot.  Smiley
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
remington
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 48
Location: Denver, CO
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
Gender: Male
Re: 1898 Krag Carbine question
Reply #11 - Jul 28th, 2012 at 9:01pm
Print Post  
Now I am leery. The rear sight is a 1902 type 3 with the auxillary peep. It does contain a "C" but on the right side, not the left. And the top graduation goes to 20. Does that indicate carbine or rifle?   Charlie
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JOHN42768
KCA Official Member
***
Offline


Krag Collector!

Posts: 94
Location: Upstate N.Y.
Joined: Apr 30th, 2009
Gender: Male
Re: 1898 Krag Carbine question
Reply #12 - Jul 28th, 2012 at 11:33pm
Print Post  
Charlie, Poyer's book states left, but Brophy states right side of base. Since the bases for the '98 & '02 are basically the same with different leafs. The difference in the base for the carbine is the height of the base. The '96, '98 & '02 carbine has the C on the right side and '01 it is on the left side. According to "The Krag Rifle" by Lt.Col. William Brophy. Now that the new photos have been added, one can see the back of the sight. Your call, John
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
5MadFarmers
Ex Member


Re: 1898 Krag Carbine question
Reply #13 - Jul 29th, 2012 at 1:20am
Print Post  
JOHN42768 wrote on Jul 26th, 2012 at 3:01pm:
So I guess unless you could physically look for any marks that could indicate a barrel change over who knows. Never say never. John


The barrels on the 1898 are different from most, but not all, 1899 carbines.  The difference can be identified without disassembly.

Dick Hosmer wrote on Jul 27th, 2012 at 4:53am:
13 are known @ 118xxx
52 are known @ 119xxx
49 are known @ 120xxx
Everything else is in single digits, but there are apparently significant blips at 125xxx and 131xxx.

Clearly, that (118-120xxx) is where the bulk of them probably occur (SA made arms in batches, based on the quarter of the year, and changing over the stocking machinery) upset only by pulling receivers from the bins using FILO).


Dick that's some weird statistical foo and results in a conclusion based on faulty logic.  It'd take a lengthy post to explain why.

Quote:
Joe Farmer says he can positively ID genuine 1898 Carbines.

Unaltered 1898 carbines.  While my accuracy rate with altered editions is likely respectable it's truly reading tea leaves.

JOHN42768 wrote on Jul 28th, 2012 at 11:33pm:
Charlie, Poyer's book states left, but Brophy states right side of base. Since the bases for the '98 & '02 are basically the same with different leafs. The difference in the base for the carbine is the height of the base.


I have some with it on the left and some with it on the right.  The marking isn't significant really.  The key, and you're seeing it there, is the height of base.  Regardless of marking the carbine base can be identified by height.  If you found an unmarked base with the correct height it'd clearly be a unmarked carbine base as the rifle base it taller.  Height is the determinate.

I don't like the finish mismatch on that - receiver/side plate.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
5MadFarmers
Ex Member


Re: 1898 Krag Carbine question
Reply #14 - Jul 29th, 2012 at 1:50am
Print Post  
Actually it shouldn't take long.  If I took a city phone book and tore it into pieces and then gave you 9 pages it's possible that 7 are sequential and the other two random from later in the book.  "Based on documented records we can say that the bulk of the people in Colusa had last names starting with the letters B, C, and D with a few having last names starting with H and some with S.  If you find a letter sourced from anyone with the last name Thompson it's likely a forgery."

Under 200 serials from a base of 5,000 isn't statistically significant. Especially given those 200 will be in larger groups on single records.  So if I find an issue document with 30 guns, 3 chests, it's well over 10% of found numbers and paints an inaccurate picture of the range.

FWIW Mook's list had him owning 132231 - listed as a carbine.  I own 131545 and I'm comfortable with it.

It's unsafe to poke into the range with SRS's records and draw conclusions.  Best to establish the bookends instead.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Send TopicPrint
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board  ^Top