Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2  Send TopicPrint
 10 GPR Sporter (Read 8174 times)
Kenfuscious
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 7
Location: Tulsa
Joined: Apr 5th, 2013
Gender: Male
GPR Sporter
Apr 5th, 2013 at 7:09pm
Print Post  
I bought a Sporter on an online auction the other day and turned out to a GPR converted back to 30-40. Were the actions proofed. Did the hole in the reciever indicate a lack of proof?

TIA,
Ken
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Top Dean
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 299
Location: Richmond, VA
Joined: Apr 22nd, 2012
Gender: Male
Re: GPR Sporter
Reply #1 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 12:11pm
Print Post  
a few pictures of what you are asking would help!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Ned Butts
KCA Forum Admin
KCA Official Member
*****
Offline


Krag enthusiast!

Posts: 525
Location: western catskills NY
Joined: Apr 1st, 2002
Gender: Male
Re: GPR Sporter
Reply #2 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 1:24pm
Print Post  
The hole in the receiver wall was for the ejector and is the only obvious indication of GP
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dick Hosmer
KCA Official Member
***
Offline


Collector of Springfield
Arms, 1865-1915

Posts: 1862
Location: Northern California
Joined: Nov 20th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: GPR Sporter
Reply #3 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 1:47pm
Print Post  
Ned Butts wrote on Apr 7th, 2013 at 1:24pm:
The hole in the receiver wall was for the ejector and is the only obvious indication of GP



How about the cut-down action rail, and the .22 CAL. stamping??
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
reincarnated
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 562
Joined: Mar 11th, 2012
Re: GPR Sporter
Reply #4 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 5:00pm
Print Post  
Were the actions heat treated? 

Based on my limited experience (one rifle), that one does not have the slick bolt operation I normally expect with a Krag.

Since the GPR was intended as a .22 rimfire from the outset, there would be no need for heat treating.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dick Hosmer
KCA Official Member
***
Offline


Collector of Springfield
Arms, 1865-1915

Posts: 1862
Location: Northern California
Joined: Nov 20th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: GPR Sporter
Reply #5 - Apr 7th, 2013 at 6:09pm
Print Post  
I believe that existing regular (hardened) actions were modified, not purpose-built for the .22. Somewhere I have seen correspondence regarding annealing  them to allow the caliber stamping. What else was done to them, I do not know, but surely removing a portion of the rail would have required softening in that area as well. As to whether they were re-hardened, that would probably not have been considered necessary, since the action was monstrously strong for a .22RF, no matter what. My GPR bolt is 'sticky', but I attribute that to a less-than-perfect plate system, which binds slightly.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
reincarnated
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 562
Joined: Mar 11th, 2012
Re: GPR Sporter
Reply #6 - Apr 8th, 2013 at 1:40am
Print Post  
The GPRs have very high serial numbers. IIRC, they were made 1906-1908, after regular Krag production was phased out.  Somewhere I read that they were a special run and because they were .22s, Springfield did not have to pay a royalty on them.  Can anyone shed some more light on this?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Kenfuscious
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 7
Location: Tulsa
Joined: Apr 5th, 2013
Gender: Male
Re: GPR Sporter
Reply #7 - Apr 8th, 2013 at 3:43pm
Print Post  
Still learning my way around this website.Bolt action is as smooth as my other Krags. I'm in need of a Pacific rear sight if anyone has one to sell or trade. I have quite a number of vintage sights. (You need to Login to view media files and links)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
butlersrangers
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 6330
Location: Michigan Bi-Peninsular&Proud
Joined: Oct 7th, 2009
Re: GPR Sporter
Reply #8 - Apr 8th, 2013 at 9:23pm
Print Post  
kenfuscious:  Your Pacific base has a vertical hole for an adjustment shaft that is part of the missing upper portion of the sight.  Is this hole on your base smooth on the inside or threaded?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Kenfuscious
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 7
Location: Tulsa
Joined: Apr 5th, 2013
Gender: Male
Re: GPR Sporter
Reply #9 - Apr 9th, 2013 at 2:29pm
Print Post  
Pretty sure it's smooth.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
butlersrangers
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 6330
Location: Michigan Bi-Peninsular&Proud
Joined: Oct 7th, 2009
Re: GPR Sporter
Reply #10 - Apr 9th, 2013 at 9:58pm
Print Post  
I could help you with some 'upper' parts if you have the K-2 Pacific base that is threaded for elevation adjustment.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Kenfuscious
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 7
Location: Tulsa
Joined: Apr 5th, 2013
Gender: Male
Re: GPR Sporter
Reply #11 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 1:25pm
Print Post  
Thanks for the offer! I confirmed the hole is not threaded.
If possible I could thread the hole for the screw type elevation adjuster. Do you know the screw size?

Regards,
Ken
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
reincarnated
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 562
Joined: Mar 11th, 2012
Re: GPR Sporter
Reply #12 - Apr 10th, 2013 at 4:26pm
Print Post  
There used to be a Lyman receiver sight, intended for the Mannlicher type rifles, that allowed the arm bearing the sight to pivot.  Could your mount be intended for something like that?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
butlersrangers
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 6330
Location: Michigan Bi-Peninsular&Proud
Joined: Oct 7th, 2009
Re: GPR Sporter
Reply #13 - Apr 11th, 2013 at 10:57pm
Print Post  
Kenfuscious:  I checked the threads on the Pacific K-2 'upper' with my thread gauge.  The thread accepted the 24tpi and 26tpi blades closely, but not fully.  I'm guessing the elevation shaft may be 25tpi.  Unusual, but may make sense in a micrometer adjustment.  The maximum diameter of the threads is .185".  I tried a 10-24 screw in the threaded hole in the base.  It engaged several threads before jamming.  I believe the K-2 sight used a peculiar thread.  I have also noticed that there are surprising variations in K-1 Pacific bases which effects hole positioning.  There must have been little gauging and a lot of hand fitting when they made these sights.  I would recommend getting a Pacific sight as a complete unit or at least trying an 'upper' on your base for function, before buying.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Kenfuscious
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 7
Location: Tulsa
Joined: Apr 5th, 2013
Gender: Male
Re: GPR Sporter
Reply #14 - Apr 15th, 2013 at 1:52pm
Print Post  
I have found a complete sight less the shaft that inserts in the magazine cutoff hole. Hopefully I can install the one in the base I have and end up with a complete sight. If not I'll just make a new shaft.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Send TopicPrint
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo