Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
1896 Carbine evaluation (Read 3100 times)
jimmyzwei
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 14
Location: Iowa
Joined: Feb 26th, 2014
Gender: Male
1896 Carbine evaluation
Mar 3rd, 2014 at 2:35am
Print Post  
while not the prettiest nor 100 percent correct (rear sight is a rifle sight).  I do believe it is an honest carbine with a 22" barrel and not a cut down.  It falls in the middle of the 2nd block as shown in Mallory 1st Ed and Brophy books.  most of the items I think are correct as near as I can tell by reading and comparing (gate and side plate look correct to me)  the patina on every thing except that rifle sight appears evenly worn.  Cartouche are not readable just can tell there are out lines and maybe some wishful thinking on my part.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jimmyzwei
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 14
Location: Iowa
Joined: Feb 26th, 2014
Gender: Male
Re: 1896 Carbine evaluation
Reply #1 - Mar 3rd, 2014 at 2:37am
Print Post  
more pic if i may
also i think the front sight is mounted correctly to the barrel (please verify)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jimmyzwei
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 14
Location: Iowa
Joined: Feb 26th, 2014
Gender: Male
Re: 1896 Carbine evaluation
Reply #2 - Mar 3rd, 2014 at 2:38am
Print Post  
last set
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
butlersrangers
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 6330
Location: Michigan Bi-Peninsular&Proud
Joined: Oct 7th, 2009
Re: 1896 Carbine evaluation
Reply #3 - Mar 3rd, 2014 at 2:53am
Print Post  
Your carbine looks like an honest Model 1896 carbine to me.  The front sight appears correct.  It would be worth while to pay the big bucks and purchase the correct rear sight, if you can find one with comparable finish.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jimmyzwei
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 14
Location: Iowa
Joined: Feb 26th, 2014
Gender: Male
Re: 1896 Carbine evaluation
Reply #4 - Mar 5th, 2014 at 2:55am
Print Post  
Bump for any additional comments or information to help me in my learning experience. 

This is my 2nd Krag the first one being a very late in production rifle, that I luck out with from CMP's last offering of a few hundred.  It was the bet of about 3 dozen in the store when first put out, and to top it off it was tagged as the higher grade, but when it went to purchasing the computer said it was the lower grade so it was sold to me at the lower price.

I have been reading and looking at picture, but that just provides a base of information, experience teaches the rest.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jimmyzwei
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 14
Location: Iowa
Joined: Feb 26th, 2014
Gender: Male
Re: 1896 Carbine evaluation
Reply #5 - Mar 10th, 2014 at 11:36am
Print Post  
One more time to see if i can get any other comments or suggestions
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dick Hosmer
KCA Official Member
***
Offline


Collector of Springfield
Arms, 1865-1915

Posts: 1862
Location: Northern California
Joined: Nov 20th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: 1896 Carbine evaluation
Reply #6 - Mar 10th, 2014 at 3:18pm
Print Post  
Looks fine to me - aside from the afore-mentioned rear sight.

I cannot read the serial, but it looks like 7020X - ??. I own 70210, which went to China with the 6th Cav, on the famous relief expedition during the Boxer Rebellion in 1900. I have the numbers of about 65 other carbines with same attribution - apparently yours is not on it since you would have found it if you checked with SRS.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo