Hello all,

I stumbled upon a possible deal on a Krag carbine. I would like to know as much as possible as to what it is, and how much it is worth. Unfortunately, somebody years ago sanded away the cartouches (outline still visible) and sporterized the stock.

Everything locks up great, the side mag is tight as can be, rifling is fantastic. The rear sigh is graduated up to 2000 with the left side having 1,2,3,B,4. When the leaf is flipped up the number 3 is stamped into the base. The front sight appeared to be soldered onto the barrel at first, but upon close inspection it is actually dovetailed in. Doesn't seem to be a home gunsmith job at all.

It also doesn't look like one of the Bannerman specials with the 1903 front sight.

The barrel is 24", or just a hair over. Shaky hands, dowel rods, and tape measures aren't great. On the left side of the receiver is stamped

U.S.
MODEL 1898     SPRINGFIELD ARMORY 104XXX


There are some markings on the receiver under the stock, i'll try to get some pictures in a little bit. No pitting under the wood line either.

Any and all input is appreciated. He's hoping it's a real Krag carbine that some goofball destroyed the stock on, and so am I. If not, knowledge is still power.

Thank you in advance.

This Krag is actually a model 1896 rifle that has been 'cut-down'.

Springfield did not make a 24 inch barrel. The barrel is shortened from 30".

Model 1896 is stamped deeply so it is easily mistaken for '1898'. The model 1896 and 1898 actions are different. This is most noticeable at the 'notch' for the root of the bolt-handle.

The rear-sight is a 1901 rifle sight. The 1901 carbine sight graduations go up to 5 (500yds) on the base and 23 (2300yds) on the leaf. The forward sight screw is missing.

The stock is a shortened rifle stock.

The front-sight has been re-cycled and nicely re-mounted on the shortened barrel.

This altered Krag would make a nice shooter, but, is only worth about $275 to $300. (In my experience, such altered Krags are difficult to sell).

Do these 1896's have any safety concerns? There are five boxes of ammunition that is available with it, all factory Remington and Winchester.

I had a low number 1903 for a while but couldn't stand having a gun I wasn't comfortable shooting so down the road it went.

I believe that is actually a Model 1898 stock which has been (VERY neatly but still incorrectly) reshaped around the bolt root to mimic the rounded scallop on a true 1896 stock. Younger eyes, other minds, what say you?

Thank you all. The level of knowledge here is astonishing. If we work out a deal I plan on trying hand loading (never done) with cast lead bullets (never done) to make light recoiling 50-100 yard plinking fodder. Even cut down, it still is a neat piece of history.

More

I've hit a conflicting issue. The more I hold the rifle, the more I fall in love with it, stock included. What irritates me terribly is that somebody cut down the buttplate and added a plastic one. How hard would it be to retrofit an original buttplate back on this? Did they ever come totally flat or are they all curved at the bottom?

If that doesn't work, I'd at least want a metal one. I've done the wooden dowel trick to plug old screw holes, and would fill in the trapdoor slots so that part of it isn't outside of my abilities.

The barrel looks indexed right based on the lines but on one side of the barrel where it screws in is a very slight gap. Is this normal?

Lastly, is there any info I can get out of those markings on the receiver and magazine?

Thank you again.