Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
cut rifling? (Read 2001 times)
Todd Doyka
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 52
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
cut rifling?
Nov 1st, 2017 at 6:46pm
Print Post  
just a question coming from "the nut gallery", but wasn't a 1898 springfield armory in 30-40 krag a cut rifling?  Undecided

thanks!!!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dick Hosmer
KCA Official Member
***
Offline


Collector of Springfield
Arms, 1865-1915

Posts: 1862
Location: Northern California
Joined: Nov 20th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: cut rifling?
Reply #1 - Nov 2nd, 2017 at 5:48am
Print Post  
Yes, button and hammer rifling were far in the future, just the old scrapers, gradually raised, and also switched from groove to groove, until desired dimension was reached.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
butlersrangers
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 6330
Location: Michigan Bi-Peninsular&Proud
Joined: Oct 7th, 2009
Re: cut rifling?
Reply #2 - Nov 2nd, 2017 at 6:48am
Print Post  
The process as I understand it:

U.S. Krag barrels underwent all manufacturing, threading, proofing, rifling, and browning (bluing) operations at the Springfield Armory 'Water Shops'. It was a very labor intensive process!

The rifling was done on 28 machines (18 old ones, that had been in use for over 40 years, and 10 new Pratt & Whitney machines).

I believe the Pratt & Whitney machines used dual cutters, cutting two opposite grooves at a time. The grooves were deepened, to a final depth of .04", as an internal tapered rod advanced the cutters on repeat passes. (I am not sure if the older machines worked the same way).

The barrels were proofed, prior to rifling, by boring (reaming) them to .298", cutting action threads and a specialized/temporary 7/16" diameter (.4375") 'straight-walled' chamber.

The Proof Cartridges had different dimensions than the .30-40 Service cartridge. A .294" projectile was used and the powder charge developed 70,000 psi.

Prior to 1897, the proof cartridge was tapered and without bottle-neck. The cartridge had wads to retain its smokeless powder charge. A loose RN lead bullet was loaded directly into the bore, in front of the cartridge case.

In 1897, a self-contained 'bottle-neck' proof cartridge was adopted with a 220 grain jacketed service bullet swagged to .294" diameter.

(I do not fully understand how this bottle-neck proof cartridge was utilized or altered the 'proof process'. Possibly, the preliminary proof process stayed the same and the 1897 Proof Cartridge was used to test a small percentage of completely finished arms)?

When totally finished, the Krag barrels were sent to the Hill Shops, where they ultimately were screwed into completed Receivers.

The Receivers were machined at the Hill Shops (from 6 1/2 pound Water Shop forgings), heat treated, and assembled, prior to barrels, with 'timed threads' being installed. 
« Last Edit: Nov 2nd, 2017 at 5:38pm by butlersrangers »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Todd Doyka
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 52
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: cut rifling?
Reply #3 - Nov 2nd, 2017 at 4:29pm
Print Post  
thanks guys!!!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint