Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3]  Send TopicPrint
 25 Model 1892 to 1896 Krag Jorgensen (Read 2572 times)
madsenshooter
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 852
Joined: Sep 10th, 2009
Re: Model 1892 to 1896 Krag Jorgensen
Reply #30 - May 16th, 2018 at 9:20pm
Print Post  
I'm with BR.  Your stock likely got changed during some rebuild.  22018 has an 1895 cartouche.  Can't say it didn't get swapped someone along the line.  The high hump sights are the same sights that were shipped later for the 1896 Cadet rifles that were already delivered sans sights.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Knute1
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 93
Location: Illinois
Joined: Sep 10th, 2016
Gender: Male
Re: Model 1892 to 1896 Krag Jorgensen
Reply #31 - May 16th, 2018 at 10:14pm
Print Post  
Geez, I guess there are too many variables. But I just couldn't explain the 1896 cartouche. Now if it is because of a stock replacement, well then that changes the pedigree. So during the 1896 updates the original stock was replaced and didn't stay with the gun? A different already altered stock was grabbed (from another 1892 rifle)? Then the stock original to this rifle, if it was still in good condition, was altered and put on a different rifle? Splitting hairs here, but researching details, on things that interest me, sometimes I go farther than most would.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
butlersrangers
KCA Forum Member
*
Online


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 4027
Location: Michigan Bi-Peninsular&Proud
Joined: Oct 7th, 2009
Re: Model 1892 to 1896 Krag Jorgensen
Reply #32 - May 16th, 2018 at 11:18pm
Print Post  
As I understand things, during re-building and major updating of Krags, at Springfield Armory, the Rifles and Carbines were taken apart.

The parts were inspected and serviceable parts underwent specified treatment and refinish.

The 'recycled' metal and wood components went into Bins. The 'rebuilt' rifles were assembled with randomly selected parts.

The rebuilt arms were function tested and fired. When "passed", a 'circle P' was applied to the stock wrist in the area behind the trigger-guard.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Knute1
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 93
Location: Illinois
Joined: Sep 10th, 2016
Gender: Male
Re: Model 1892 to 1896 Krag Jorgensen
Reply #33 - May 17th, 2018 at 1:42am
Print Post  
Ohhtay!!! So my stock may not be original to the rifle, but it was still likely installed by the armory. Plus, I got a high hump rear sight. I'm good with that. Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dick Hosmer
KCA Official Member
***
Offline


Collector of Springfield
Arms, 1865-1915

Posts: 1639
Location: Northern California
Joined: Nov 20th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Model 1892 to 1896 Krag Jorgensen
Reply #34 - May 17th, 2018 at 2:51pm
Print Post  
This is NOT intended as ANY sort of put-down, or any desire to stop the discussion. We find many 'odd' assemblies today. Some are so goofy that they can be dismissed out of hand, but others are quite logical, and MAY well be (within reason) "correct". The arms have passed through too many hands, with no chain of custody, to be 100% certain in all cases.

Bottom line: The personnel of the Ordnance Department were trying to field the most up-to-date TOOL that could be provided to the soldier, and that involved swapping some parts, not always at the same time, or place, and not always with the same parts(!) though they WERE also striving for interchangeabiity. They had absolutely NO thought that they might be confusing future participants in a hobby that had not even been invented yet!

End of rant  Smiley  Smiley
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
FredC
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 283
Location: Dewees, Texas
Joined: May 31st, 2013
Gender: Male
Re: Model 1892 to 1896 Krag Jorgensen
Reply #35 - May 17th, 2018 at 6:34pm
Print Post  
These were the early days of fully interchangeable parts and they tested the limits, when doing refurbs. In earlier days mixing parts like this would have been impossible.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
butlersrangers
KCA Forum Member
*
Online


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 4027
Location: Michigan Bi-Peninsular&Proud
Joined: Oct 7th, 2009
Re: Model 1892 to 1896 Krag Jorgensen
Reply #36 - May 18th, 2018 at 11:57am
Print Post  
BTW - Knute's bolt (body) is the early type or "model 1892", with the solid rib.

The 'Striker Mechanism/bolt sleeve/extractor' are of a later type.

His bolt body has none of these listed changes.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Knute1
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 93
Location: Illinois
Joined: Sep 10th, 2016
Gender: Male
Re: Model 1892 to 1896 Krag Jorgensen
Reply #37 - Jun 8th, 2018 at 3:16am
Print Post  
The dragnet for non-converted model 1892 rifles in 1901.

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dick Hosmer
KCA Official Member
***
Offline


Collector of Springfield
Arms, 1865-1915

Posts: 1639
Location: Northern California
Joined: Nov 20th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: Model 1892 to 1896 Krag Jorgensen
Reply #38 - Jun 8th, 2018 at 2:53pm
Print Post  
Hmmmm - wonder where you would find one with a "Model 1892" stamping?
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Knute1
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 93
Location: Illinois
Joined: Sep 10th, 2016
Gender: Male
Re: Model 1892 to 1896 Krag Jorgensen
Reply #39 - Jun 8th, 2018 at 11:20pm
Print Post  
The following is from The Secretary of Senate report fiscal year ending 6/30/1897. It lists the expenditures for the Springfield Armory. Circled in blue is in regards to model 1892 alterations. Not sure if I understand what it means.

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Knute1
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 93
Location: Illinois
Joined: Sep 10th, 2016
Gender: Male
Re: Model 1892 to 1896 Krag Jorgensen
Reply #40 - Jun 10th, 2018 at 8:32pm
Print Post  
In researching the "Expenditure at the Springfield Armory " reports, the following was found:

Fiscal year ending 6/30/1897 (as seen in the post above),
    3,508 magazine rifles altered to model of 1896 with model of 1892 extractors.
    2,800 magazine rifles, model of 1892, altered to model of 1892, second pattern.

Fiscal year ending 6/30/1898,
   No mention of model of 1892 alterations.

Fiscal year ending 6/30/1899,
    Report could not be found.

Fiscal year ending 6/30/1900,
    1,588 altered to model of 1896.

Fiscal year ending 6/30/1901 (as found in Chief of Ordnance Report),
    6,123 altered to model of 1896.

Fiscal year ending 6/30/1902,
    5,420 altered to model of 1896.

Fiscal year ending 6/30/1903,
    No alterations of model of 1892 shown.

This is only an opinion, and I know the horse has been beat to where there isn't even any pulp left, but:
What I can gather reading the various reports, once a model of 1892 was converted to model of 1896 it was then considered a model of 1896 and no longer a model of 1892 as far as the military was concerned. Somewhere I found a list in one of the reports showing what consisted of a conversion and I will post it if found again. Others likely already have this info.

I am quite confident that my particular rifle was converted in the 1897 fiscal year, but there does not appear to be any solid evidence.
   
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 
Send TopicPrint
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board  ^Top