Dick Hosmer wrote on Apr 28
th, 2014 at 1:50am:
I believe the notation said the picture was taken here in the US, which would fit in with above post,
I recently ran across this same pic and it was captioned as Camp Dick, TX.
Quote: though I still find the use of an unaltered 1892 to be unusual at that point in time.
That and the uncertain uniform of the other individual make me wonder if the rifle and this individual were from a National Guard unit. Given the extreme shortage of rifles as the US began to mobilize for war, does anybody know if any NG units reported for duty with their rifles? Only idle speculation on my part but is it possible that some NG unit Krags may not have undergone arsenal improvements that regular Army rifles did when put into storage or along the way?
For me this is a timely thread as I was thinking about starting a "US Krag in WWI" thread. There has been a Krag bayonet/scabbard listed on eBay recently that is being offered attached to a M1917 ammo belt, supposedly having belonged to a relative of the seller who was in the US Cavalry in WWI. At first I thought it was odd to see the scabbard attached to such a late-dated belt and started searching on the net on the subject. I found a few pics that I thought I'd share.
I also ran across some threads from other sites that discussed the training use as well as issue to engineer and other support/non-combat units that carried their Krags to Europe and pics that support that. US policy was that all troops were sent to Europe with a rifle and due to shortages, it was felt the Krag would suffice for them. I read of one engineer co. that was involved in a surprise engagement with a German unit early on and it is speculated that they may have been armed with Krags, though I don't know if there is supporting evidence of that. It would be interesting to know if their was an AAR, unit history or letter home that verified that. (continued)