Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
US M1892/96 rifle. correct forward barrel band ? (Read 1609 times)
bayoned
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


I like US Krags. (plus
a bunch of other stuff
!)

Posts: 7
Location: Upper MidWest
Joined: Mar 27th, 2017
US M1892/96 rifle. correct forward barrel band ?
Mar 27th, 2017 at 9:22pm
Print Post  
Hi,

i have a US M1892/96 rifle. Serial 7174. (Still has the early first style bolt body with the parallel sided guide rib)
The side cartouche is dated 1898.

My question: what would be the correct front barrel band style? It currently has the band style with the milled off top-middle and has the slit on the bottom just behind the bayonet lug. (I do have an early solid band in the parts box. Would this one be correct?)

thanks,
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
madsenshooter
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 1079
Joined: Sep 10th, 2009
Re: US M1892/96 rifle. correct forward barrel band ?
Reply #1 - Mar 28th, 2017 at 2:37am
Print Post  
You sure the last number of the cartouche isn't a 5?  Could be 1898 if it went back to the arsenal for a full rebuild and needed a stock.  The slotted band didn't come into use until up around serial #250,000, but was often retrofitted upon rebuilds.  So your solid band would seem more correct.  However, if it doesn't fit right you'd be better off with the one you can tighten.  If you pull on the barrel and the forearm behind the band, in opposite vertical directions, you shouldn't be able to detect any movement.  I've had some that allow too much movement.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bayoned
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


I like US Krags. (plus
a bunch of other stuff
!)

Posts: 7
Location: Upper MidWest
Joined: Mar 27th, 2017
Re: US M1892/96 rifle. correct forward barrel band ?
Reply #2 - Mar 28th, 2017 at 4:31pm
Print Post  
Actually, I'm not positive of the last digit in the date stamp, as the side stock cartouche is worn and somewhat difficult to make out. (the wrist "P" is much crisper.)

The stock does not appear to be a modified '92, as it has no trace of a filled cleaning rod channel. The toe is the later rounded style.

The barrel muzzle has been crowned. The rear sight is the '96.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dick Hosmer
KCA Official Member
***
Offline


Collector of Springfield
Arms, 1865-1915

Posts: 1862
Location: Northern California
Joined: Nov 20th, 2005
Gender: Male
Re: US M1892/96 rifle. correct forward barrel band ?
Reply #3 - Mar 28th, 2017 at 5:22pm
Print Post  
If it is not a modified 1892 stock and it has the proper wood contour at the bolt root, then it must be a replacement stock of Model 1896 form, and the date is probably not 1898 - though I would tread lightly and not change anything irreversible until I was sure of what I was doing.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
bayoned
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


I like US Krags. (plus
a bunch of other stuff
!)

Posts: 7
Location: Upper MidWest
Joined: Mar 27th, 2017
Re: US M1892/96 rifle. correct forward barrel band ?
Reply #4 - Mar 29th, 2017 at 12:58am
Print Post  
The stock is definitely not an upgraded / modified 1892.
It does has the correct '96 bolt root configuration and contour.

So, if this stock cartouche is NOT 1898, then what might it be?
(And i think i'll take that advice, and just leave the rifle as it is.)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
madsenshooter
KCA Forum Member
*
Offline


Krag Enthusiast!

Posts: 1079
Joined: Sep 10th, 2009
Re: US M1892/96 rifle. correct forward barrel band ?
Reply #5 - Mar 29th, 2017 at 1:28am
Print Post  
It might be an 1896 stock.  1892 stocks do not have lightening cuts in the barrel channel, 1896 stocks do have the cuts.  The cartouche for a model 96 stock could range from 1896 to 1898.  The 1896 stock also has a thicker wrist.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint