(UTC)
Welcome, Guest. Please
Login
Board Index
Help
Search
Login
Krag Collectors Association Forum Archive
›
Firearms
›
U.S. Military Krags
› 1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question
(Moderators:
KCA Forum Admin
,
Ned Butts
,
Tom Butts
)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
[3]
4
5
Send Topic
Print
1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question (Read 26478 times)
Marksc
KCA Forum Member
Offline
Krag Enthusiast!
Posts: 26
Joined: Oct 11
th
, 2017
Re: 1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question
Reply #30 -
Oct 13
th
, 2017 at 10:35pm
Print Post
One thing about it guys, you know your stuff. No, I have not fired it. Just got it and wanted to break it down and clean and inspect it good before that. I appreciate all your input and Thank You.
IP Logged
butlersrangers
KCA Forum Member
Offline
Krag Enthusiast!
Posts: 6330
Location: Michigan Bi-Peninsular&Proud
Joined: Oct 7
th
, 2009
Re: 1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question
Reply #31 -
Oct 13
th
, 2017 at 11:10pm
Print Post
'Marksc' - Someone gouged a lot of wood from your stock in order to 'fit' the unfinished 'left rear-corner' area of your receiver.
BTW - Model 1896 Krag actions were machined pretty much the same as model 1898 actions in that area. In fact a model 1898 action will fit into a model 1896 stock. (However, Springfield did not use this arrangement). A model 1896 Krag will not fit into a model 1898 stock, without alteration, because the receiver is different at the bolt handle 'recess'.
Attached is a photo of a model 1898 stock showing the appearance of the normal receiver inletting.
IP Logged
BW
KCA Forum Member
Offline
Krag Enthusiast!
Posts: 7
Joined: Mar 18
th
, 2017
Re: 1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question
Reply #32 -
Oct 14
th
, 2017 at 1:18am
Print Post
Any opinions as to how this might affect the legality of owning or selling the rifle in question? If it is unnumbered it is impossible to say whether or not federal law classifies it as an antique. If it had a number which has been removed, it could mean big trouble. If the number was left off for some reason, then what?
IP Logged
Marksc
KCA Forum Member
Offline
Krag Enthusiast!
Posts: 26
Joined: Oct 11
th
, 2017
Re: 1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question
Reply #33 -
Oct 14
th
, 2017 at 2:35am
Print Post
Already thought of this. We are located in the middle of GM town. And like others have many friends. It is going to have receiver x-rayed in **** plant tomorrow which will tell the truth. All measurements and test tonight prove to this point it has not been ground or altered.
IP Logged
Marksc
KCA Forum Member
Offline
Krag Enthusiast!
Posts: 26
Joined: Oct 11
th
, 2017
Re: 1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question
Reply #34 -
Oct 14
th
, 2017 at 2:45am
Print Post
Oops, maybe GM, Ford or Chryler.
IP Logged
Marksc
KCA Forum Member
Offline
Krag Enthusiast!
Posts: 26
Joined: Oct 11
th
, 2017
Re: 1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question
Reply #35 -
Oct 14
th
, 2017 at 2:53am
Print Post
Pic showing bottom of receiver.
IP Logged
butlersrangers
KCA Forum Member
Offline
Krag Enthusiast!
Posts: 6330
Location: Michigan Bi-Peninsular&Proud
Joined: Oct 7
th
, 2009
Re: 1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question
Reply #36 -
Oct 14
th
, 2017 at 3:26am
Print Post
Lots of U.S. rifles and shotguns were made in the early 1900s without serial numbers. Licensed dealers, FBI, and BATF know that not all firearms were made with a serial number and they have a process for NSN (no serial number) arms.
I would not have legal worries about the lack of a serial number on this model 1898 Krag. It never had one.
Attached picture of a model 1899 receiver bottom for comparison with OP's.
«
Last Edit: Oct 14
th
, 2017 at 5:35am by
butlersrangers
»
IP Logged
FredC
KCA Official Member
Offline
Krag Enthusiast!
Posts: 759
Location: Dewees, Texas
Joined: May 31
st
, 2013
Gender:
Re: 1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question
Reply #37 -
Oct 14
th
, 2017 at 11:19am
Print Post
I would not worry about the lack of a serial number either. This thing was built by the government and released to be distributed by the DCM to end up in the hands of civilians.
Another disquieting thought, maybe the step was not forgotten but another defect was encountered and the step skipped on purpose. Were the proof marks just done on the barrel? Was the barrel from another gun and this receiver never proofed?
If a dangerous defect was detected and the receiver was not completed on purpose then it should not have been heat treated. Since mark is having tests run checking for heat treat would be in order. My self I would try a small file test in an obscure area of the receiver, at a automotive lab they will have hardness testers but they will have to keep in mind the shallow case with a very soft core is normal for Krags. It will be very different than the modern automotive steels made today.
Right now I am inclined to think the DCM/NRA, Bannerman, or Stokes made a custom stock for the carbine and released a safe gun to the public.
But as Charlie Brown said "It is a mystery."
IP Logged
psteinmayer
KCA Forum Member
Offline
Krag Enthusiast!
Posts: 2391
Location: Ypsilanti, Michgan
Joined: Aug 30
th
, 2011
Gender:
Re: 1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question
Reply #38 -
Oct 14
th
, 2017 at 12:25pm
Print Post
Where in Automobile Land are you located? Both Butlersrangers and I live relatively close to the big D. Perhaps a physical inspection might reveal some additional insight. Plus... it's always great to get together at a range occasionally!
Facebook
IP Logged
butlersrangers
KCA Forum Member
Offline
Krag Enthusiast!
Posts: 6330
Location: Michigan Bi-Peninsular&Proud
Joined: Oct 7
th
, 2009
Re: 1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question
Reply #39 -
Oct 14
th
, 2017 at 1:27pm
Print Post
I believe Mark said there was a "P" on the receiver ring, which makes this whole circumstance more curious.
You would think someone should have noticed things were not quite right prior to heat-treat. Possibly, this is revealing of the speed and volume of the work at SA!
I bet someone got yelled at in the Hill Shops! A lot of effort went into reducing that 6 and 1/2 pound forging into an almost finished receiver.
Hey, 119 out of 120 operations ain't bad.
I doubt that Mark's Krag was completed into a finished arm at Springfield. I doubt it was ever sold by the DCM.
It seems plausible it was salvaged by one of the surplus dealers, who bought the Armory's obsolete parts, finished and unfinished.
'FredC's' suggestions about testing receiver's hardness are good ones.
p.s. This is fun!
IP Logged
FredC
KCA Official Member
Offline
Krag Enthusiast!
Posts: 759
Location: Dewees, Texas
Joined: May 31
st
, 2013
Gender:
Re: 1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question
Reply #40 -
Oct 14
th
, 2017 at 5:01pm
Print Post
Stamping the number after heat treat seems like it would have been hard on the number stamps maybe impossible. I am pretty sure it was done before, if so a spoiled receiver could have the number noted as it was destroyed and the number assigned to a new one later. Any clue as to whether numbers were reused or just skipped?
Thinking about this some I would have stamped the number after a last inspection prior to heat treatment.
There was that irregularity first noted when the receiver was in the stock, wondering if that prevented it from fitting in the fixture where that late operation was done around the trigger pivot point.
IP Logged
Marksc
KCA Forum Member
Offline
Krag Enthusiast!
Posts: 26
Joined: Oct 11
th
, 2017
Re: 1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question
Reply #41 -
Oct 14
th
, 2017 at 11:05pm
Print Post
Great info Guys, Just got out of work and can add a few things. Receiver was x-rayed in shop. No welding has been done on receiver. No numbers have ever been stamped into receiver. Original stamping has not been altered.
IP Logged
Marksc
KCA Forum Member
Offline
Krag Enthusiast!
Posts: 26
Joined: Oct 11
th
, 2017
Re: 1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question
Reply #42 -
Oct 14
th
, 2017 at 11:13pm
Print Post
Here is the proof on receiver.
IP Logged
Marksc
KCA Forum Member
Offline
Krag Enthusiast!
Posts: 26
Joined: Oct 11
th
, 2017
Re: 1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question
Reply #43 -
Oct 14
th
, 2017 at 11:14pm
Print Post
Better View
IP Logged
Dick Hosmer
KCA Official Member
Offline
Collector of Springfield
Arms, 1865-1915
Posts: 1862
Location: Northern California
Joined: Nov 20
th
, 2005
Gender:
Re: 1898 Krag Missing Serial # Question
Reply #44 -
Oct 15
th
, 2017 at 3:09pm
Print Post
Interesting thread! I cannot believe that receiver was ever put on an arm at SA - it HAD to have come out by the back door, in some manner.
If it were mine, I'd abandon all thoughts of building (forcing) it into a rifle, strip it of parts, and mount it to a nice walnut base and use it as a MOST unique paperweight on my desk. Just my $.02.
WWW
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
[3]
4
5
Send Topic
Print
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›